Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Customer Service | Contact Us | Routes Available | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Now that things have settled down a bit in Washington, D.C., do you think it will be business as usual?

  1. Yes, more gridlock
  2. Short-lived improvements
  3. No, Congress embarrassed itself
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(50)

TheDiogenist

Oct-19-13 3:22 AM

It's a sad day when it isn't an option to answer that 'business as usual' for Congress entails some sort of legislating. Their raison d'être, likesay.

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Oct-19-13 7:59 AM

Corruption, destruction, stealing, lying, etc.... yeah business as usual.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

realwildchyld

Oct-19-13 7:59 AM

No change until we can get a new president and reid and pelosi are gone from the left......Bonehead from the right needs to go as well.

We need term limits and since we are the people with the votes we need to vote people out when needed.

7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Oct-19-13 9:27 AM

oops.. forgot gloom, despair and agony.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Oct-19-13 9:55 AM

To use the word business in connection with Washington DC is a great insult to business owners. Change "business" to "party" would be more correct.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Bobs2cents

Oct-19-13 10:42 AM

Veritas, I disagree with your post except for one point. I'd love it if the red-blooded American conservative minded patriots with good values and work ethic could be given a state like Texas. I'd move there, our society would prosper, and we'd watch the liberal society around us collapse upon itself.

5 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Missy1

Oct-19-13 11:17 AM

Basically it will be the same, except, Obamacare: it fines you for not buying a product you don't want from a website that doesn't work.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Bobs2cents

Oct-19-13 11:28 AM

Nope, wouldn't have to ban TV. As a really free society without a nanny-state government always thinking they know what's best for people, free from political correctness, we would understand that we can simply change the channel if we don't like watching libs, and those honey boo boo shows that turn ones brain to mush..

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-19-13 1:00 PM

Obviously, Bob is blinded by his neon conservatism in considering a move to Texas. Probably some research on your part, Bob, would bring to light the shortcomings of that conservative state. Just like most of the red states, Texas is a welfare state on taxes, taking more out than they put in. More research will also show that Gov. Perry(he, of the no government money, etc), used federal money to balance the budget of Texas instead of putting it to good use for the people. He did all of this so he could bloviate while running for president. You should also check on the number of children and people without health care and the average wage of the general population. So, if you really want to go to Texas, don't let the door hit ya.

4 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 3:49 PM

they are juvenile in ignoring history and continuing to think supply side economics or the theory of trickle down must be tried again."

Currently, our government is engaging in economic practices popularized by John Keynes, or "demand-side" economics. Keynesian economics is not all good....

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 3:50 PM

investopedia...

Another criticism of the (Keynesian) theory is that it leans toward a centrally planned economy. If the government is expected to spend funds to thwart depressions, it is implied that the government knows what is best for the economy as a whole. This eliminates the effects of market forces on decision-making. This critique was popularized by economist Friedrich Hayek in his 1944 work, "The Road to Serfdom". In the forward to a German edition of Keynes' book, it is indicated that his approach might work best in a "totalitarian state".

How's your Saturday, fellow serfs?

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 3:54 PM

"...neon conservatism..."

Where can I buy that? It would look cool in a window at night, maybe to advertise something, well, conservative.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 3:55 PM

PJinfinity: "This newspaper -- and the Republican party it represents -- is one, big, ugly joke."

Like Bob said, you're free to change the channel. As in yesterday.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Bobs2cents

Oct-19-13 5:02 PM

See now this kind of thing is fun. Before you know it, we're splitting hairs over Texas being a good mecca for all things conservative and I've learned a new phrase "neon conservatism", although I'm not really tracking what that means. But please don't compare Honey Boo boo to yogi bear, Winnie the poo and Paula Dean. Those 3 were and still are quality television entertainment that is good for the American culture, stuff to raise your kids on, ya know? But Honey Boo Boo, that's just trash, along the lines of Rosanne, trash. Looking forward to the next political round of comments. Sorry if I hurt any libs feelings today, I know how sensitive ya'll can be.

4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 5:46 PM

"Loons"

Now is that more of the tolerant liberal-speak I keep hearing about?

Tolerance for some, not for all.

5 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 5:50 PM

Uh, "Republican gridlock" is not a valid term.

"In politics, gridlock or deadlock or political stalemate refers to a situation when there is difficulty of passing laws in a legislature because the votes for and against a proposed law are evenly divided, or in which two legislative houses, or the executive branch and the legislature are controlled by different political parties, or otherwise cannot agree."

See? It does take two to do the DC tango.

The participants? Democrats and Republicans.

Democrat slanted viewpoint? Yes, that is a valid term.

5 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 5:54 PM

"Even a Democrat cannot tell you how they will repay these TRILLIONS Their answer is raise taxes.. but nothing about stopping the increase in debt we see daily."

Did y'all see some libs here go postal about McConnell's pork deal? Why no squeal about Democrat pork?

I say ALL pork is pork, whether it's Dem or Rep. ALL money projects should go under the knife, for trimming, for cutting, or for discarding.

5 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Oct-19-13 5:56 PM

Must have touched a "tolerant" nerve there, huh?

If liberals choose to portray themselves as the more enlightened, the more fair, the more just, the more compassionate, and yes, the more tolerant, it shouldn't bother them a bit to look in the mirror now and then.

I can agree, enough is enough, Veritas.

5 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-19-13 8:52 PM

Lets just take one of bdgi's ludicrous statements and dissect it: "Republicans are for less debt and more business with less EPA interferance." We have a history to verify bdgi's statement... False-Pants on fire- complete distortion. Well, we have had twenty years of Republican leadership in Reagan, Bush, and bush. In each tenure, there was massive deficit spending, huge deregulation, and wild spending. History shows that, figures back it up. Take that premise and shove it. It is a lie.

6 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 9:45 AM

BDGI, you have never published any facts in your blogs. Just like your last one about Afghanistan and no end in sight. But, you have no idea on the government spending. My blog was correct and it can be verified on any site except Fox News. Republicans are the huge spenders and have hurt the country financially. As to the deficit, it is dropping fast which never has happened under the Republicans. As to the figures you present, remember we are under all the programs that the Republicans set up during Bush's term. The obstructionist Republicans have made sure of that. So, take your out of state opinions and stuff them. Your blogs are full of lies and hatred. You are the person of hate on the blog and it is time for you to blog in your state. We still have Trillion dollar waste in the tax gifts to the rich, medicare D, the wars, taking care of the veterans, and it is from the Republican legacy.

6 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 4:01 PM

Bdgi, is it "experation or expiration?" The Bush tax GIFT's were extended when the Republicans blackmailed the Administration into extending it by withholding approval of an extension of the unemployment benefits at Christmas time. The scrooge effect of the Republican party. So, in essence, the Republicans forced the extension or a lot of middle class Americans would have been devastated right at Christmas. Does this mean that The Republicans hate the middle Class. On your way of thinking, that would be true.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 4:06 PM

Don't even begin to talk about the veterans, loser. the Republican party has cut veterans services since back to Reagan. Bush II cut funding to veterans and veteran facilities throughout his administration. The current crew of right wingers has continued to cut veterans benefits by pushing through the sequestration (Boehnor- I got 98% of what I wanted). It is estimated that it will cost in the neighborhood of 3-4 Trillion dollars for veterans rehabilitation over the next twenty or more years and all because the Republicans lied about WMDs so they could get to the oil in Iraq. But, of course, Iraq will pay for the war etc, etc. You know nothing except that again you have pointed out that Republicans must hate veterans.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 4:21 PM

Oh, and don't even bring up medicare part D. You don't know what you are talking about. That bill immediately gave 2 Billion dollars in profit to the Pharma's. Set up a subsidized medicare supplement program that we pay for every day, and then instead of allowing the government to get competitive bids on pharmaceuticals, it allowed the pharma's to max charge medicare for drugs. Don't you even think about defending that 1.5 trillion dollars boondoggle to the pharmaceutical industry.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 4:25 PM

So, in summary, bdgi, your posts are total miss information and irrelevant to any intelligent discussions. We are lucky to be getting out of the Iraq/Afghanistan debacle as soon as we are. Bush led us to a disaster that he was warned to stay out of by his own father. There was no exit strategy and because of the surrounding countries, you could not pull out, just like that. Take your out of state ignorance and keep it out of state.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Oct-20-13 4:30 PM

Oh, and one more thing, bdgi, lets see the sites for the payoff thingy. You cannot back up what you say factually, so you make things up. You comments on Pelosi show your complete lack of understanding and also how little you really know.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 50 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web