Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Routes Available | Home RSS
 
 
 

Do you admire President Obama more or less now that he's latched onto the gun violence issue?

  1. More
  2. Less
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(62)

Missy1

Jan-22-13 1:49 PM

Never admired him before, no reason to start now.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-19-13 6:49 PM

JayBird, the NW misses you. Terribly. Right about now.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Hope4Change

Jan-19-13 6:43 PM

Over 30 million Law abiding Gun Owners in America, have killed no one. Why do you blame the crimes of the criminals and unlawful gun owners, on the one who never commit the Crimes? You can save a lot of time and money if you target those criminals who illegally possess fire Arms, and leave the rest of us alone!

We did not commit the Crime and we will not surrender our personal fire Arms while a bunch of traitors in Government are arming themselves to the teeth against us!

So stick your treasonous, infringements, Oath of Office breaking, sedition, Invasion of our inalienable Rights, and rebellion against our Constitution and the American People. Our god-given Rights are not mere government privileges granted by the State. And we will defend our lives, liberty, and property from government tyranny. If you don't like it here, leave now and avoid the rush!

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-19-13 12:54 PM

Rajj, I agree that the word "latch" has certain connotations.

Remember Mayor Bloomberg's program? "Latch on NYC?"

Yeah, I think lots of folks had a reaction to that, one way or the other.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rajiihammr

Jan-18-13 11:12 PM

Latched? Latched? Biased wording of a question much?

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 8:43 PM

I suspected "blue" would win out for the T-shirt.

C'est la vie

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

matman

Jan-18-13 8:38 PM

VERITAS- I'll take a blue one.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Spirit

Jan-18-13 8:25 PM

What a laughable phrasing of that question. You should have had "added to your already disgust of the man" as another true option.

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Hope4Change

Jan-18-13 4:13 PM

Nor did I think they were crossing the line Veritas...I had one yesterday disappear when comparing Hitler and Obama liking to photo op in front of little children.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VERITAS

Jan-18-13 4:10 PM

Loco...I can agree with you on that!

7 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 4:01 PM

Well, Veritas, I didn't vote for bumping your posts.

I think both the 1st and 2nd amendments are inalienable.

9 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 4:00 PM

Looks like one of Veritas' posts got bumped, so I guess I'll have to retract my "laughable" and "precedence" references. They don't make sense anymore.

Not that making perfect sense has been the one and only objective here on MDN, right?

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VERITAS

Jan-18-13 3:59 PM

Two of my posts today "Removed from site"

Didn't think I was too contumelious considering other comments but I understand 1st Amendment rights are subjective while 2nd Amendment rights are inalienable.

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 2:03 PM

The color for the Clinton side?

Why not gray?

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 1:59 PM

Veritas, *duh* on your factcheck factoid.

But my point remains the same.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-18-13 1:49 PM

Veritas, factcheck . org was useful during last year's campaign. I remember liberals frequently posting factcheck's articles, as it suited their attempts to disqualify an opponent's source.

Why else would I have chosen the organization to check your "facts" Veritas? You mean I should just accept your word as truth? California Dreamin' that...

Well, I'm glad you yourself have deemed factcheck as a non-reliable source to explore all sides of a story.

Now the next time a liberal uses it, I will say it is laughable, as I have precedence now.

Thanks for the gift :-)

6 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Hope4Change

Jan-18-13 1:33 PM

Wounded Knee was among the first federally backed gun confiscation attempts in United States history. It ended in the senseless murder of 297 people.

Wounded Knee is the prime example of why the Second Amendment exists, and why we shouldn’t be in such a hurry to surrender our Right to Bear Arms. Without the Second Amendment we have no right to defend ourselves and our families.

Suzy Gratia-Hupp had it correct when she told Senator Charles Schumer, “The 2nd Amendment ISN’T about duck hunting. It’s about all of us being able to defend ourselves against all of you.”

7 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VERITAS

Jan-18-13 12:34 PM

I would like to thank Hope4.. For bringing up that historical fact and reminding all of us how close we were to making a similar mistake last November. Thankfully the country chose wisely and however painfull it may seem at times...We will move forward.

6 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

muleskinner

Jan-18-13 12:20 PM

I almost was shot in the head with a shotgun blast when I was a kid. I felt the waft of the blast just above my head. I'm a bit gun shy because of the incident, very cautious, and abide by all of the rule when shooting a firearm. Just happy to be alive ever since then. A long time ago now. You have to be very careful when handling firearms. In the past 30 years, I have fired a high powered rifle twice. I don't even know where my BB gun is. I sold my shot gun 20 years ago. I quit hunting, would rather see the animals live in the woods with Bambi. Not kidding.

Besides, a well-aimed, perfectly placed BB shot will disable anybody and they won't have to die.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Hope4Change

Jan-18-13 11:23 AM

And these were Americans too...

December 29, 2012 marked the 122nd Anniversary of the murder of 297 Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. These 297 people, in their winter camp, were murdered by federal agents and members of the 7th Cavalry who had come to confiscate their firearms “for their own safety and protection”. The slaughter began AFTER the majority of the Sioux had peacefully turned in their firearms. When the final round had flown, of the 297 dead or dying, two thirds (200) were women and children.

7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

muleskinner

Jan-18-13 10:46 AM

It costs taxpayers 1.6 billion each year to run the White House. 438 workers there make over 100 grand per year.

Drones kill women and children in Pakistan and Afghanistan, under Obama's executive leadership, where is the outrage that he is responsible for the deaths of women and children in foreign lands? HE is spending the billions to prosecute those kinds of acts.

Wake up peoples

5 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

leftwing

Jan-18-13 9:45 AM

You would think that with almost 300 million guns in this country that we would would be the most safest in the world,but it's the complete opposite. So How's that working for us.The writters of the constitution were not all that smart becouse they left out the part that said this will be null and void if stupidity over rules sanity.

5 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WorriedAmerican

Jan-18-13 9:34 AM

Stock market is at a five year high! Sounds like " gloom & doom" there ms!

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

muleskinner

Jan-18-13 8:57 AM

None so blind as those who will not see.

4 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

garmst

Jan-18-13 8:50 AM

Gun idiots Trying To Use Fear Again

7 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 62 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web