Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Routes Available | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Should Republicans agree to President Obama's demands and raise the debt ceiling without tying it to spending cuts?

  1. Yes
  2. No
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(21)

WorriedAmerican

Jan-15-13 8:27 AM

Republicans cannot be that stupid! They are going to stop gov't from paying its financial obligations and risk another downgrade and another financial disaster for what! the elder will not receive their SS checks, the military & their families won't receive their checks! Doesn't the republican party get it!

6 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

garmst

Jan-15-13 9:01 AM

Republicans Need To Get Real Spending Cuts Need To Be Done Later

4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

minreader

Jan-15-13 9:17 AM

WA, what are the republicans suspose to get? What they get is you can't spend more than you make! However obama got more money from the payroll taxes, form 4.2% to 6.2%. So look back to where Romeny said obama your tax plan will raise taxes on the middle class, obama "that's just not true". Will now talk and listen to the working class now and see what was not true!

6 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WorriedAmerican

Jan-15-13 9:32 AM

minreader yes,however this money we have already spent and we must pay it back now! It has nothing to do with future spending it has everything to do with people's everyday lives that depend on their federal gov't checks that are owed to them! SS and the Military!!! Are you going to deny them what is theirs???

4 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Missy1

Jan-15-13 9:36 AM

I'm getting really sick of this Presidents threats and badgering on every issue. No one elected him to run this Government totally by himself.

7 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

minreader

Jan-15-13 9:46 AM

Missy1, we all are sick of it. obama has allways made threats to the seniors and military and will continue. Some kinda sad

7 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

minreader

Jan-15-13 9:54 AM

WA, yes we need to pay it back and also pay it forward. But what we need is a balanced buget, a structured debt repayment. As for the seniors yes we need to repay the SS, however the gov should not be raising the retirement age to recieve full benefits. IDK just my veiwpoint

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

animal

Jan-15-13 10:06 AM

WA,your a fool! Obama thinks he is Emperor, not pres. and he depends on fools to be fearful of what he will take awat from them if he doesn't get his way,just like the spoiled little baby that he is!!He throws his tantrum, kicks his chair and makes threats (remind you of anything) This guy is out of control and has been his entire life! The poor little half breed from a dysfunctional home WA-WA-WA I'm sick of him and his spend like spoiled brat in a candy store it is time someone put him in his place!! We cannot continue to spend and borrow more than we possibly can repay any business person can tell you that! Only children and fools think there is no end to this sort of behavior!!

6 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WorriedAmerican

Jan-15-13 10:18 AM

What is the President suppose to do? The Congress hasn't done anything but kick this can down the road again and again and avoid this issue over and over again! They have played politics with the American people's lives! Put everyone's future in jeopardy and somehow the President is suppose to have faith that the Congress is going to act and do the RIGHT thing! Really? Have you saw any positive action from Congress in the past 4 years???

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

minreader

Jan-15-13 11:16 AM

WA, the dems had controll the first 2yrs of obama rule. However obama was so busy with his health care plan and traveling abroad. Also using tax payers money to fund green energy compaines that five have gone under. So where was the President when the USA needed a leader?

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

vietnamvet69

Jan-15-13 12:31 PM

The party of NO sat on their a** for the first four years of his term, trying to make it his only term, but we know how that worked out. Now the party of NO could care less about the country, but only want to make sure that nothing that the President wants is ever passed. I am just sick and tired of all this political bickering, and Mitch McConnel needs to go retire and go back home with the"good old boys" and rethink his position in life.

4 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

trueamerican

Jan-15-13 1:49 PM

Before the debt ceiling can be addressed a budget should be put in place. havent had one of those in how many years. Maybe if we had a budget we could see how much is going to be spent compared to how much is being brought in. No vote on raising debt ceiling until a valid budget is in place.

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

centerfield

Jan-15-13 2:30 PM

Maybe you wingers should be telling your house members to stop spending first. They went to dinner and are trying to skip out on the bill. The republican way.... They have threatened their way for four years, do we expect any less from the obstructionist party... They put the party first and the country last... Republican right wingers.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WorriedAmerican

Jan-15-13 3:38 PM

centerfield apparently all of this debt occured when the democratic party controled everything in the first two years of Obama's first term! No spending happened before or after that time period according to the Fright Wingers Talking Heads!

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WorriedAmerican

Jan-15-13 3:43 PM

trueamerican we haven't had a balanced budget since the Clinton administration!

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-15-13 4:58 PM

WA, trueamerican said "budget" not "balanced budget." You can't balance what you don't have.

animal said, "We cannot continue to spend and borrow more than we possibly can repay." Well, not in present-day DC. It seems that it's all academic for the squeakiest wheel (the one demanding the most) to get the grease. Incredible!

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

trueamerican

Jan-15-13 5:04 PM

Even with Dems controlling both houses, they could not pass a budget. The party screwing everyone is the Dem party. Blame the Republicans all you want but it is Harry Reid who has not and will not put a budget to vote. A balanced budget would be great but even Clinton did not balance the budget. It was like everything else, it was projected to be balanced. I could use fuzzy math and balance it too, but that does not make it so.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

polidork

Jan-15-13 5:15 PM

Just FYI, mindreader, the payroll tax was 6.2% until Obama lowered it temporarily to 4.2% as part of the stimulus. The reason it went back up to 6.2% is because Republicans, during the recent tax-cliff negotiations, would not allow it to remain at 4.2% (it goes against their 'trickle down' ideology). Thus, when you have less money in your pay check you should know where to accurately cast your blame.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

disgusted

Jan-15-13 7:57 PM

Yes, it was cutting edge to reduce payroll tax which funds SS when unemployment was so high. It was also cutting edge removing SS from the 'box'. And to take it a step further, it was cutting edge to take money from payroll checks and send it to the government for each one's retirement, etc. What I really think is cutting edge is giving kids SS from dead beat dads who have never worked, have never supported their kids, and now are 30 y/o disabled drug abusers. I guess we do agree that no money should be taken from our checks and we should each be responsible for our own retirement.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jan-15-13 10:27 PM

Cutting edge? I'd say it was a stroke of genius, and polidork for one has fallen for it.

So only the Republicans are to blame for payroll taxes going back up to 6.2%? Yeah, right.

Brooklyn Bridge for sale, folks...

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

OldCat

Jan-16-13 3:07 PM

The SS pot had been raided by both parties to finance what was considered to be programs to meet national social needs--I don't really disagree with you disgusted but where would or should the money come from to pay those "needed services"--I'm not a follower of Herbert Spencer. Some people in this country do need support just as much as we have supported 3rd world countries.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 21 of 21 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web