McCain’s ‘vision’ for 2013
Jim Eykyn, Publisher; Bryan L. Obenchain, Editor
POSTED: May 17, 2008
Fact Box
To submit a letter:Email us at:
news@minotdailynews.com
McCain discussed his vision of 2013, and what may be happening after the end of his first term as president. Huh? Has McCain been elected? Did we miss the election?
Among other things in his speech, McCain, or should we call him the new age Nostradamus, said he sees “spasmodic” but reduced violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the death or capture of Osama bin Laden and a cut in government spending.
McCain sees the Iraq war being won by 2013 and sees Iraq as a functioning democracy.
McCain sees that there still has not been a major terrorist attack in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001.
McCain sees several years of robust growth for the United States economy, and appropriations bills void of lawmakers’ pet projects. He also sees an energy crisis curbed by the start of construction on 20 new nuclear reactors.
Oh, and McCain also sees himself running for a second term.
Wow. Quite a vision for a man whose presidential aspirations seemed impossible a year ago, and who hasn’t even officially been named the Republican Party’s presidential nominee yet.
Using our own crystal ball, we’re looking ahead only as far as January 2009. We see someone on the podium, giving the inaugural address as the next president of the United States.
Is it John McCain?
Unlike the Arizona senator’s clear vision of the future, our crystal ball still seems a bit fuzzy on that.
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-2 | Post a comment
|
ACF1Kite
|
|
|---|---|
|
05-18-08 2:50 AM
|
It is a terrible editorial. It is full of sarcasm and is written in a poor style. Unlike Democrats, McCain is letting us know what he wants to do as President. And I like what he wants to do. Are you saying the candidates shouldn't tell us what they envision happening under their leadership? I wish more candidates would tell us what they are going to do. And why not be optimistic on your chances of reelection?
|
|
berylj
|
|
|
05-17-08 10:10 AM
|
One could say...if an editorial mandates and threatens, it is not a good editorial. If an editorial enlightens and persuades the reader, it's a great editorial. This is one great editorial. Thanks.
|


