Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Customer Service | Contact Us | Routes Available | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Flood plan: A dose of reality

January 31, 2013

A preliminary schedule for a Minot flood protection plan was laid out Tuesday for members of the city council, and one thing is crystal clear after that presentation: Should Minot opt to move forwar......

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Feb-03-13 7:48 PM

“Why not just buyout all of the homes/businesses that were flooded?“ Good idea Muleskinner. If you Republicans don’t like the flood control plan, just wait until the Des Lacs has her 100 year flood without any flood control. As much water as 2011 and half the warning. I will be watching and smiling from up on the hill.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-31-13 1:15 PM

Excellent opportunity for Mr. Walters! Retired from the City, got elected to the Ward County Commission and works for the Engineering Firm in charge of the flood planning! Sweet deal!

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-31-13 11:47 AM

More like a large dose of federal welfare bucks that an engineer firm can get rich with and all reality went out the window! City of Minot went on a panic spending spree! A mismanaged 100 year flood all caused by human error!

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-31-13 9:19 AM

820,000,000 dollars to build flood control structures might work, but I wouldn't count on it.

Sounds like more of a money spending plan than it is a real flood plan.


Why not just buyout all of the homes/businesses that were flooded?

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-31-13 8:52 AM

Why don't they use the flood protection plan we already built. We built several temporary holding ponds that have been made into recreation areas, why don't we just drain those down so they can hold the runoff like we intended them to. I think it's crazy to come into a city to fight a flood that should be stopped way before it gets to the city. It's not like we are running out of countryside. Why not make a diversion right on this side of the border to handle the excess stored water in Canada. The diversion would't have to involve any cities or the property in them. The only real answer is to use what we have in place correctly and we will be just fine. I'm sure it's a huge problem to save face after that man made disaster but a few peoples embarrassment isn't worth over 500 million dollars.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 5 of 5 comments


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web