|
|
What went wrong, and whyJanuary 28, 2013During the weeks before the November presidential election, questions about the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans came primarily from Republicans.... Showing 25 of 74 comments Show More Comments
Post a Comment |
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web |
JackAaah
In order to move forword, we just must continue to ask ourselves "what difference does it make?"
And we must also ask "what difference does it make?" if we hear ANYTHING about Sen. Robert Menendez(D) going out of country to have s e x with underage posstitutes.
6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
Yes, just like the original 9/11/2001 investigations! When did the administration know about it, and why didn't they prevent it, and who is responsible for it?
2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
JackAaah
What difference does it make........
8 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
OldCat
Yes-What difference does it make at this point in time? a terrorist or drive by shooting? --the cover-up--only one that I can see is this MDN editorial in the litter box.
2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hope4Change
A lot of people in Washington apparently forgot how good Hillary Clinton is at not telling the truth. So accustomed had Hillary grown to having her lies glossed over that she grew increasingly indignant even at the timid questions Congress threw her way at last week's Benghazi hearing. When asked by Senator Ron Johnson about her version of events, Hillary exploded in an outburst destined to be at least as famous as her "vast right wing conspiracy.”
Said Hillary, summing up the state of public integrity in 2013, "What difference at this point does it make?" Say what you will, but today, that is a legitimate question.
Maybe OldCat should check her own litter box.
6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
OldCat
60 minutes showed her "outburst" --fist pounding and all-trying to make her point about trying to prevent this kind of happening again. Walrus will never give up his attitudes including mocking other bloggers.
2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
VERITAS
I love it!...6 posts on the Ben Gazzara conspiracy and another 6 posts on "Killing the Coal Industry"
Seems the MDN Editorial Board has the pulse of the nation in mind or.......Is this an attempt to deny the ICE shelf is melting so the GOP can also deny that Global Loathing does not exist?
3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
JackAaah
oldcat-"Wally Russ"...now there's another Hillsboro resident I feel I will never see at the Hillsboro Free-Lunch Counter Café....
5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hope4Change
Liberals have for years gone to Steve Croft of CBS for their first choice of softball interviews. It is certainly the choice of the Clintons and most recently last Sunday’s love affair with Hill and Baracko.
The media is preparing the way for her to run in 2016 and last Sunday’s Croft job was no exception. She would be an extension of the last eight years and can still cover for Obama’s failures.
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
Why didn't the house release the security money that was already budgeted for these embassies? Why not an investigation on that? Looks to me more like a political "revenge party". Sec. Clinton kept refering the investigating commission to read the classified version of the events. I wonder if any one of them did? If they had any evidence of any cover up at all it would have been brought out long before the election! It was a bureauacratic screw up between the state dept. and the DOD and the house budget commitee which cost those lives of our four Americans.
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hope4Change
The House budget committee did ask Hillary if you needed the money, why didn’t you ask? That is all bogus anyway as the State Department has what is called an interagency that can move funds to wherever they deem fit.
Ambassador Stevens on many occasions requested more support but never got it. Place the blame where it belongs. Hillary is the head of the State Department and was asleep on the job. Don’t you think 9-11 should be alert enough? Oh but there was a campaign going on that was more important.
2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
h4c do you actually BELIEVE any politician or sitting President would sacrifice the lives of Americans just to win an election?
1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
h4c did you read the classified documents? Of course not? So we do not know all of the facts do we? So not knowing the fact means there must be a cover up. RIGHT! Could it be they cannot release certain information in order to catch the one responsible for the attack? I have never saw such a bunch of so called Americans quick to throw their leaders under the bus! Why is it that all of you believe everything this administration does has an evil plot to destroy America? What would be the purpose? Who would gain from this? Who would President Obama be working with? Please explain the so called logic behind this?
1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
locomotive
Worried, nobody said anything about "sacrificing Americans to win an election." What I see is that 1) the American public was not told the truth for several days after the event, and 2) Mrs. Clinton's testimony seemed to further cloud an already questionable issue.
Does it make a difference now? Well, yes. Mostly because the spin was aggressive, as Susan Rice gave out the story about the video on more than one talk show.
So, if Ms. Rice didn't know anything, like Mrs. Clinton almost implied, why did she speak as though she did, that what happened was the fault of a video?
It looks funny, OK? It leads a person to think "where there's smoke, there's fire."
This one's free: if gov't officials don't want cynical citizens, they should just up and tell the truth once in a while.
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
OldCat
Obviously the "TRUTH" about rioting Islamic mobs was not nearly as effective as militant Islamic terrorists or how about Weapons of Mass Destruction. Your right about being cynical loco-if they could just tell the truth. My litter box is well contained H4C-its not spread all around like yours.
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hope4Change
I didn’t know OldCat was in my fan club but so be it. I must have touched a nerve in the old cat as she out on the prowl looking to set her claws in anyone that disagrees with her and Hillary.
I reality I LOVE CATS, THEY TASTE LIKE CHICKEN. You can leave the litter box outside as it leaves the house stinking.
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
OldCat
h4c muck raking tusks at it again-same blubber different day.
2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hope4Change
SCAT CAT you are nipping too much Kat nip. Aside from that what are you talking about?
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
VERITAS
Like I said before....6 posts on this issue....What a roar!
2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
OldCat
no explanation required-self evident.
1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
lorexx says, "Any Commander in Chief that is worth his salt never sends troops into harms way without a back up and an escape plan."
These people were not troops! They were state dept personel along with CIA operatives! We don't know all the details! Because they are CLASSIFIED!!!!
What was Bush's exit plan in Iraq?
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
Why did Dick Cheney say that we would be greated as "Liberators"! They did not have an exit statedgy when they went in originally and that is why we got bogged down in Iraq!!! You know that as a fact! You can try and spin it like all you repubs like to spin your failures!!
0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
Bush & Cheney had no idea about the different tribal differences in Iraq and the civil war that would develop there. All they saw as Rumsfeld said was easy targets to use their new so called "smart bombs" for their "shock and awe"! My two sons were there from the start and had to wear those biochemical suits during the invasion and found out there wasn't any chemical weapons!
1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
lorexxx we have been messing with the middle east for decades! Wasn't it in the 70's we were helping the Sha of Iran and then he fell and the Reagan came in and with the help of Cheney and Rumsfeld propped up Hussien in Iraq and we supported him against Iran. Funny how we continue to screw things up!
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
WorriedAmerican
lorexxx That is your argument? really?
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »