Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Routes Available | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Black nurse sues after hospital bans her from caring for Neo-Nazi's baby

February 18, 2013 - Andrea Johnson
How much say should patients have in what doctor or nurse provides medical care for him or for his child?

Tonya Battle, a black neonatal nurse at Hurley Medical Center in Flint, Mich., is suing the hospital because she was banned from caring for a baby at the father's request.

According to the New York Daily News, the father, apparently a Neo-Nazi, allegedly told Battle's supervisor that he "didn't want any African Americans caring for his baby" and then rolled up his sleeve to show her a Swastika tattoo. The supervisor then held a meeting to inform staff of the father's wishes and a note was pinned on the baby's isolette saying "No African American nurse to take care of baby." During the month the child was in the neonatal unit, no black nurses were allowed to tend to the baby, according to Battle's lawsuit. Battle's lawsuit alleges discrimination by her employer.

The father's attitude is despicable, but federal law also does allow him to choose his child's health care provider. All of us exercise patient choice whenever we choose a new doctor or nurse and the choice does not always come down to how competent the doctor is at his or her job. Sometimes it may be made for reasons that sound prejudiced and are unfair to a particular health care provider.

Maybe a patient chooses a particular doctor because she wants to see another woman, even if the male doctors on staff are equally good. Or maybe a patient has said no to a particular doctor because he speaks English with a heavy accent or has a foreign name and the patient feels more comfortable seeing a doctor from his own country, someone who shares his background. Occasionally a patient simply doesn't like a doctor or nurse or his bedside manner and tells the supervisor, "Find me someone else." If there is another doctor or nurse available, the hospital supervisor would probably reassign the patient's care to someone else, as seems to have happened here. Does the Neo-Nazi father have any less right to exercise patient choice because his personal prejudices appear so irrational and hateful to the majority of the world?

Battle thinks allowing the Neo-Nazi father patient choice because of his prejudice violated her rights. Is she right? Should the hospital supervisor have told the parents they would have to seek care for their child at another hospital if they didn't want black nurses treating her?

 
 

Article Comments

(5)

locomotive

Feb-20-13 11:28 AM

It's called the human condition, Worried. Almost any human is capable of breeding...

WorriedAmerican

Feb-19-13 11:08 AM

What is even more sad is that these Neo-Nazi's are breeding!

EarlyBird

Feb-19-13 6:59 AM

To many "feel good" lawsuits these days, I'm pretty sure we all get our feelings hurt now and then and don't sue people over it.

locomotive

Feb-18-13 5:27 PM

I agree with disgusted, as far as the hospital protecting the nurse, from a new father who has "irrational and hateful" prejudices. If the hospital hadn't done what it did, there might have been a whole different outcome, perhaps much more unpleasant than just his request.

disgusted

Feb-18-13 1:06 PM

Oh, for Pete's sake. Patients have the right to limit who cares for them. Just as lab techs, housekeeping, nurses, etc have the right to 'switch' their assignment. that nurse should be happy that she wasn't FORCED to care for patient. The hospital was PROTECTING her and she should be thanking her lucky stars.

 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web